Science
In reply to the discussion: Five things that modern science cannot explain: [View all]truedelphi
(32,324 posts)At least according to the experts.
So why is it decided on that this one insertion is what makes us similar, in terms of common ancestor? It certainly doesn't make us so similar that you or I would marry a baboon, or chimpanzee. (At least I wouldn't, not on most days. But I suppose if I met a baboon that was rich enough and charming enough, it might work.)
Anyway both you and I live in a society where many humans don't even see other humans as worthy of life. Witness how the Nazis behaved in the 1940's, or how the American government has trained its military to behave ever since.
So if I don't accept how the definition of "relationship, genetically" and common ancestry should come from an endogenous retroviral insertion, I am not sure that that means I am naive or stupid.