Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

defacto7

(14,162 posts)
10. I can't pinpoint where I saw it
Wed Jan 29, 2014, 03:56 PM
Jan 2014

but someone posted and extreme closeup of it that was no more revealing than anything else. It may have been a zoom or enhancement from a high resolution pic, but there does seem to be a less than sufficient collection directly from NASA. Maybe they're completely convinced there's nothing to see. But that would make me more interested to prove what it is, not what it isn't. Or maybe the "prime directive" is to be reticent till it can be blurbed by a politician and not have wasted political grandstanding by mere scientists.

There, I've covered reason to CT in one paragraph.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»NASA is being sued for co...»Reply #10