Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Science

Showing Original Post only (View all)

jakeXT

(10,575 posts)
Wed Mar 12, 2014, 05:57 PM Mar 2014

The 17 Equations That Changed The Course Of History [View all]

Mathematics is all around us, and it has shaped our understanding of the world in countless ways.

In 2013, mathematician and science author Ian Stewart published a book on 17 Equations That Changed The World. We recently came across this convenient table on Dr. Paul Coxon's twitter account by mathematics tutor and blogger Larry Phillips that summarizes the equations. (Our explanation of each is below):

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/17-equations-that-changed-the-world-2014-3




Ian Stewart claims that the Black-Scholes equation changed the world. Does he really believe that mathematics caused the financial crisis?

"It was abuse of their equation that caused trouble, and I don't think you can blame the inventors of an equation if somebody else comes along and uses it badly," he says.

"And it wasn't just that equation. It was a whole generation of other mathematical models and all sorts of other techniques that followed on its heels. But it was one of the major discoveries that opened the door to all this."

Black-Scholes changed the culture of Wall Street, from a place where people traded based on common sense, experience and intuition, to a place where the computer said yes or no.

http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-17866646
17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I agree with the solution to Black-Scholes. louis-t Mar 2014 #1
Ain't that the truth! TxDemChem Mar 2014 #2
No kidding, but nothing will throw a spanner into it more quickly Warpy Mar 2014 #3
Some hard prison time for some of these bankers wouldn't hurt either. hunter Mar 2014 #4
The first of Maxwell's Equations is given incorrectly jobendorfer Mar 2014 #5
In the book, Stewart notes that he's using a simpler form of the equations. Jim__ Mar 2014 #6
That's boooring. You end up with equation 8 again. DetlefK Mar 2014 #7
Wow! I bet Stewart didn't know *that* when he included both equations in his book. Jim__ Mar 2014 #8
One does not need to dumb it down to discuss it. DetlefK Mar 2014 #12
Stewart's point was that Maxwell's simplified equation resolves to the wave equation. Jim__ Mar 2014 #13
Perhaps Napier's logarithms did not actually satisfy equation #2 but something rather like struggle4progress Mar 2014 #9
I'm not sure what point they're trying to make. Jim__ Mar 2014 #14
Read the translator's preface at your link: the table of so-called "hyperbolic logarithms" struggle4progress Mar 2014 #15
OK, thanks. I this thought that this was his original book. Jim__ Mar 2014 #16
Part of it seems to be his original book, in English translation struggle4progress Mar 2014 #17
#3 is anachronistic: the limit concept is nineteenth century struggle4progress Mar 2014 #10
Regarding #5, Euler did indeed introduce the symbol i for the square root of -1, struggle4progress Mar 2014 #11
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»The 17 Equations That Cha...»Reply #0