Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

tclambert

(11,194 posts)
13. Not according to Sen. Inhofe. All that greenhouse stuff is just Al Gore pranking us.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 05:17 PM
Jan 2015

I suppose it depends some on the ingredients of the atmosphere. But I would guess you are right. My quick calculations say Venus gets about 50% more solar radiation than Earth, but the massive insulating properties of the Venusian atmosphere make it even hotter than that would suggest. My guess is Kepler 438b would fall somewhere between Earth and Venus climate-wise. "Cosy" may be the interstellar real estate codeword for "hot as hell."

Oh, further down in the article it says they expect Kepler 438b may have a mean temperature of 60 degrees Celsius, which works out to about 140 degrees Fahrenheit (or 14 furlongs if I got the right conversion factors there). That's Death Valley in July plus a smidge. Not pleasant. In fact, at that temperature it takes about 30-35 minutes to pasteurize milk. So, let's name the planet Pasteur.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Very cool! Feral Child Jan 2015 #1
If it's larger than Earth and receiving more heat, isn't it likely to be a runaway greenhouse planet MillennialDem Jan 2015 #2
Depends on what's in the atmosphere. jeff47 Jan 2015 #8
"planets don't have a fixed density" Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2015 #10
Unless the planet is largely crustal with a small nickel-iron core MillennialDem Jan 2015 #11
Not with the information we have. jeff47 Jan 2015 #15
Depends on the greenhouse gas levels. Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2015 #9
Well yes but provided there is significant water vapor / methane / CO2 wouldn't MillennialDem Jan 2015 #12
There were theories that early earth should have done the "runaway" thing too... Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2015 #16
You're presuming the planet has Earth's chemical makeup. jeff47 Jan 2015 #17
Not according to Sen. Inhofe. All that greenhouse stuff is just Al Gore pranking us. tclambert Jan 2015 #13
Cool! Now we just have to travel at the speed of light for 470 years and we can start ruining it! Scuba Jan 2015 #3
I'm positive it wouldn't take us that long. I saw it done on TV once. BlueJazz Jan 2015 #5
... Fearless Jan 2015 #18
LOL! AllyCat Jan 2015 #21
Welcome Keplarians! BrotherIvan Jan 2015 #4
I remember when they claimed dwarf stars had no planets. Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2015 #6
many trillions of miles away heaven05 Jan 2015 #7
Eight new planets where life could exist found Judi Lynn Jan 2015 #14
I wonder what we would be able to find if..... BobbyBoring Jan 2015 #19
You know, maybe this is how everyone in the Old Testament lived AllyCat Jan 2015 #20
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Most Earth-like planet ev...»Reply #13