Science
In reply to the discussion: Quantum Biology and the Puzzle of Coherence [View all]tama
(9,137 posts)There is nothing vague about stating that 'emergentism', reduction of biology and/or mental phenomena - including math - to mere classical physics are not empirically proven science but just word salad and wishfull thinking and philosophically irrational woo woo woo. There is nothing vague about stating that those who yet so believe and make such claims in the name of science are pseudoscientific cryptoreligionists when they behave like preachers and members of inquisition defending their orthodoxy.
In this thread I've seen you root for the claim (or rather the belief system of the claimant?) that the EPR thought experiment has been empirically falsified, which is blatantly wrong as the opposite is true. Showing up with such credentials as a "defender" of science on a god damn science forum makes it rather tempting to draw opposite conclusions about your true motives. But I rather withhold my judgement, stay open minded as well as I can and listen in case you might have something to say worth listening.