Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Science
In reply to the discussion: Scientists have developed an eye drop that can dissolve cataracts A whole lot better than surgery. [View all]Dark n Stormy Knight
(10,482 posts)70. I'd like to see cost a reduction in costs so that anyone who wants it can afford
presbyopia-correcting IOLs to be implanted during cataract surgery. I've just begun to suffer presbyopia and it's a total fking pain in the ass that all the print in the world seems to have been put through a Shrinky Dink oven! I'm almost looking forward to cataracts so I can get the PCIOLs implanted--if I can afford it. Which I probably can't.
If you need cataract surgery, you may have the option of paying extra for new presbyopia-correcting IOLs (intraocular lenses) that potentially can restore a full range of vision without eyeglasses.
Multifocal and accommodating IOLs are the two main types of presbyopia-correcting IOLs. These IOLs may offer significant advantages over conventional single-vision IOLs, which typically provide clarity at near, intermediate, or distance ranges but not all three at once.
For example, a single vision or monofocal IOL might enable you to see objects at a distance, but you would still need reading glasses for sharp near vision. Or you might be able to see objects close-up, but you would still need eyeglasses to drive.
The FDA approved certain presbyopia-correcting IOLs only within the last several years. This means that, for the first time, people undergoing a cataract procedure have a chance to simultaneously correct for presbyopia and thus achieve independence from reading glasses. Remember, however, that for certain near vision activities you may still benefit from wearing eyeglasses, even if you do choose a multifocal or accommodating IOL.
But aren't presbyopia-correcting IOLs a lot more expensive? How much extra do I have to pay?
Presbyopia-correcting IOLs are more expensive because they cost more for companies to develop and produce, and because extra surgeon skill is required for a procedure that includes the use of these lenses. Also, extra care must be taken with these lenses to make sure you receive the exact right prescription for your eyes. Costs vary, depending on the lens used, but you can expect to pay up to $2,500 extra per eye. Otherwise, basic costs of cataract surgery are covered by Medicare and most other health insurance policies.
Why won't Medicare or health insurance cover the full cost of presbyopia-correcting IOLs?
A multifocal or accommodating IOL is not considered medically necessary. Medicare or private insurance typically will pay only the cost of a basic intraocular lens and accompanying cataract surgery. Use of a more expensive, presbyopia-correcting lens is considered an elective refractive proc
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
79 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Scientists have developed an eye drop that can dissolve cataracts A whole lot better than surgery. [View all]
PADemD
Jul 2015
OP
It depends on the skill of your surgeon. My wife had the surgery a couple of years back.
HubertHeaver
Jul 2015
#6
I have Kaiser too. The thing about this drug is, will it still result in a replacement lens?
Hoyt
Jul 2015
#26
My second grade report card says it all. ______'s behavior has improved since she got her
JDPriestly
Jul 2015
#33
My history is much like yours. I just turned 66, and began wearing glasses when I was around
Tess49
Jul 2015
#18
My ophthalmologist (sent there by my optometrist) tells me that I will be astonished by the
Tess49
Jul 2015
#35
Yes. I had those symptoms, although not to the point where I'd given up night driving.
SheilaT
Jul 2015
#37
So true. I've been wearing only glasses now for several weeks. Don't miss the contacts.
Tess49
Jul 2015
#41
Three days would have been wonderful. My 2nd one will be done 2 weks after the first.
Tess49
Jul 2015
#61
I will. I will know about the total cost at this next visit. Some of it depends on what type
Tess49
Jul 2015
#60
I'll ask about that. I'm like you though, it's going to happen either way, regardless of cost.
Tess49
Jul 2015
#63
I was told I would be able to drive to the opthalmologist's office for an appt. the day
No Vested Interest
Jul 2015
#65
I hope prescrption costs stay low, that UC & taxpayers not Pharma reap financial benefits.
stuffmatters
Jul 2015
#36
I didn't have to pay anything, but it could have been my insurance plan at the time.
valerief
Jul 2015
#43
Agreed -no pain. My eye surgeries were just this month - July 2015. nt
No Vested Interest
Jul 2015
#46
Good. I was told I was developing a cateract in on eye. Too bad there's no timeline.
marble falls
Jul 2015
#47
Not making a joke, it will likely be possible to treat older pets who often have bad cataracts.
GoneFishin
Jul 2015
#51
Yes I thought of this immediately when I read this. My pet has other vision problems but I have
Person 2713
Jul 2015
#59
But my retinas are shielded from ultraviolet by my implants! Can your eyedrops do that?
Towlie
Jul 2015
#69
I'd like to see cost a reduction in costs so that anyone who wants it can afford
Dark n Stormy Knight
Jul 2015
#70