Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

muriel_volestrangler

(106,236 posts)
22. 'pressed against' meaning 'floating in it', really
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 05:25 PM
Aug 2015

The atmospheric pressure under the rocket would have to be enough to take the entire weight of a tube that reaches up out of the atmosphere (and is rigid enough to have a vacuum inside against this huge pressure keeping it floating), plus the thrust of the rocket. I'm not convince it would stand up to any calculation. And then the rocket rotates with the planet, which means it's only pointing in a reasonably useful direction for some of the time, and you have to keep it stable sideways, and ...

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Spread kilotons of fine particulate matter in the upper atmosphere. Maedhros Aug 2015 #1
hmmm... retrowire Aug 2015 #3
There are limited options. Maedhros Aug 2015 #7
What about a means retrowire Aug 2015 #8
Given enough energy, it could be done. Maedhros Aug 2015 #11
Wow! Thanks so much! retrowire Aug 2015 #12
Don't thank me - thank Niven. Maedhros Aug 2015 #18
I don't think 'gargantuan' begins to cover it muriel_volestrangler Aug 2015 #20
Here's what I remember: Maedhros Aug 2015 #21
'pressed against' meaning 'floating in it', really muriel_volestrangler Aug 2015 #22
That can be done by using an asteroid to transfer momentum from a gas giant to your world Fumesucker Aug 2015 #28
Sulfuric acid has been suggested RufusTFirefly Aug 2015 #2
Anyway to do it without blocking out the sky? n/t retrowire Aug 2015 #4
Not really Hydra Aug 2015 #5
Damn, well retrowire Aug 2015 #6
Ya, but unintended consequences Hydra Aug 2015 #9
Hmm, I didn't consider the "every reaction has an equal and opposite reaction" clause... retrowire Aug 2015 #13
I'm not an expert either Hydra Aug 2015 #15
Well I thank you anyways! retrowire Aug 2015 #16
It's not like we're talking about the sky turning black Silent3 Aug 2015 #10
Huh. Okay, that's true.... retrowire Aug 2015 #14
Not an expert by any means, I doubt I could do the math... Thor_MN Aug 2015 #17
Okay. Very, very outlandish. "Thermoelectric effect." DetlefK Aug 2015 #19
This might help... NeoGreen Aug 2015 #23
Here is some info on terraforming SoLeftIAmRight Aug 2015 #24
Great information. Bonobo Aug 2015 #33
Could be: The expansion of the planet while it cools, would move particles (of matter and force) DhhD Aug 2015 #25
Carbon nanofibres made from CO2 in the air Agnosticsherbet Aug 2015 #26
Bad idea. DetlefK Aug 2015 #31
Increase the albedo to reflect more ligh back into space. On Earth if we could spread the ice sheets MillennialDem Aug 2015 #27
How??? DetlefK Aug 2015 #30
I didn't say it was easily doable :p I imagine massive bulldozer operations could push them to MillennialDem Aug 2015 #32
"The most efficient way would be to dim the star" said Tom darkly Fumesucker Aug 2015 #29
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»I need assistance with a ...»Reply #22