The word "yet" is key.
Scientific conjectures, theories, and results need to be falsifiable, and the scientific community exists to support this requirement.
The result presented is a great example of the principle.
I think this is a beautiful and ingenious experiment and it will help to push the entire field forward, said David Kaiser, a physicist at M.I.T., who was not involved in the study. However, Dr. Kaiser, who is with another group of physicists who are preparing to perform an even more ambitious experiment next year that will soon measure light captured at the far edges of the universe, also said he did not think every scintilla of doubt had been erased by the Dutch experiment.
<snip>
The experiment has closed two of the three major loopholes beautifully, but two out of three isnt three, Dr. Kaiser said. I believe in my bones that quantum mechanics is the correct description of nature. But to make the strongest statement, frankly were not there.
A potential weakness of the experiment, he suggested, is that an electronic system the researchers used to add randomness to their measurement may in fact be predetermined in some subtle way that is not easily detectable, meaning that the outcome might still be predetermined as Einstein believed.
To attempt to overcome this weakness and close what they believe is a final loophole, the National Science Foundation has financed a group of physicists led by Dr. Kaiser and Alan H. Guth, also at M.I.T., to attempt an experiment that will have a better chance of ensuring the complete independence of the measurement detectors by gathering light from distant objects on different sides of the galaxy next year, and then going a step further by capturing the light from objects known as quasars near the edge of the universe in 2017 and 2018.
Can you imagine how much better off humanity (
and the planet we live on) would be if religions operated this way??