Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Science

longship

(40,416 posts)

7. But detecting lies by facial expressions is an extraordinary claim.

Reply to SoLeftIAmRight (Reply #6)

Fri Feb 19, 2016, 07:09 PM

Feb 2016

I would expect the evidence to rise to that level. That is why I am not just skeptical, but doubtful.

There will have to be sufficient evidence to overcome the doubt that the research is not just not aberrations in the experimental protocols.

That is how science works. One has to cover the bases, in a new hypothesis like this, doubly so.

We will see. I wish the researcher's luck.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

What do the current finding in neuroscience reveal about the relation between lying and physical exp [View all] SoLeftIAmRight Feb 2016 OP

Is this another "Lie to Me" police procedural drama sub-plot? longship Feb 2016 #1

I am not seeing any references to current... SoLeftIAmRight Feb 2016 #2

Then I would say that my (and your) evaluation might be correct. longship Feb 2016 #3

quick look shows this - no woo here SoLeftIAmRight Feb 2016 #4

I am skeptical of these claims. longship Feb 2016 #5

I make no claims SoLeftIAmRight Feb 2016 #6

But detecting lies by facial expressions is an extraordinary claim. longship Feb 2016 #7