Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pokerfan

(27,677 posts)
5. Only because it's next to the trench...
Sat May 21, 2016, 08:13 PM
May 2016

which can't honestly be argued to be part of the mountain per se in term of "tallness." In terms of elevation rise from the nearest depression, sure. And one can make a prominence argument that I won't deny.

But Mauna Kea, on the other hand, is all mountain from the sea floor. One continuous mountain "only" a million years old. Amazing.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Is Mount Chimborazo In Ec...»Reply #5