Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Science
In reply to the discussion: Have We Already Won the Renewables Revolution? [View all]kristopher
(29,798 posts)42. I'd like to cover one point I neglected to address earlier
Growth rates don't belong to the renewable technologies themselves - a technology is chosen by users who want it, and people still want whatever's cheapest. They don't say "we see there's a growth in solar, therefore we demand more of it", they say "how can I heat my house cheaply?" (and very few are using renewables for that; those are making small inroads into electricity production, but gas, oil and coal still do the vast amount of heating in the world).
I believe you are going to find that the heating and cooling problem actually favors renewable deployment and microgrids since a very good way to address the variable production schedule of wind and solar is to use thermal storage as a buffer. Everyday stone makes an excellent and inexpensive medium for storage and the heat exchange systems are not a tech challenge. This works in residential, commercial and industrial environments.
Additionally, as new buildings gradually replace older ones, there is every expectation that net-zero construction will become the norm. I can't tell you how disappointed I was when the Obama proposal to standardize and rate all buildings by their energy needs in a manner similar to automobile window stickers was shot down. Putting that kind of information in the hands of buyers would be a great incentive for net-zero building.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
60 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
My F150 gets about 4 mpg less with E85 than E10. When I pull my trailer is goes to about 5.5 less.
tonyt53
Oct 2016
#52
e-cars just shift the dirt around if powered by coal generated electricity instead of petroleum nt
msongs
Oct 2016
#2
I don't see at all that "we as a species" have deliberately chosen renewables
muriel_volestrangler
Oct 2016
#37
"the challenge is to make that work" - you were saying the revolution was already won
muriel_volestrangler
Oct 2016
#46
"And, as I said, there is no 'inertia' in economics. That's wishful thinking."
kristopher
Oct 2016
#51