Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Science

In reply to the discussion: Free Radicals, pro and con [View all]

eppur_se_muova

(42,023 posts)
6. Please post further discussion in the Health Group.
Thu Jan 26, 2017, 11:33 AM
Jan 2017

While antioxidants have been the subjects of epidemiological studies, such studies do not provide much in the way of mechanistic explanation of any effects observed. Thus the matter of the benefits, or otherwise, of deliberate medication with antioxidants before the evidence is fully analyzed is at present one of judgment and/or policy, and is more appropriately discussed under Health.

It is certainly true that touting the benefits of antioxidants has been overhyped, and become something of a fad in some quarters, but this only came about *after* some studies suggested AOs were beneficial in some respects. It was, of course, a matter of no time at all before AOs were being touted as "cures" for everything from cancer to aging to impotence. Hopefully, after more studies are in, the pendulum will swing back the other way, in the usual fashion.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Free Radicals, pro and co...»Reply #6