Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Binkie The Clown

(7,911 posts)
8. I'm skeptical.
Sun Sep 10, 2017, 12:32 PM
Sep 2017

I want to see more than an abbreviation here and there. I want to see a complete interlinear gloss, generally accepted by other qualified linguists before I'll believe it's been "decoded". I've seen too many fanciful and sensationalist claims made by others regarding this manuscript, the Rongorongo script, the Harappa and Mohenjo-daro, Linear-A, the Cypro-Minoan syllabary, and even code systems like Chaocipher (which was finally solved in 2013).

I have a keen interest in cryptography and linguistics so I follow these developments closely. I look forward to reading more about this claimed Voynich solution, so I can check it against my own (digital) copy of the Voynich manuscript.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»The mysterious Voynich ma...»Reply #8