Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(38,671 posts)
18. Exactly...
Sat Oct 20, 2018, 08:44 PM
Oct 2018

...and I back up what I say with data.

I note that I started my adult life as a dumb-ass anti-nuke "renewables will save us" cretin, this almost half a century ago.

Then I learned how to read, and read widely.

I make no secret that I believe that anti-nukism is a very, very, very, very, very dangerous and ignorant fact of life, and I appalled, absolutely appalled, by its popularity on my end of the political spectrum.

And yes, I'm too old and too educated to accept what clearly are delusional pipe dreams.

We hit 411 ppm of carbon dioxide this year in the planetary atmosphere. Maybe you didn't hear about it.

I never tire of saying that we just spent in the last ten years two trillion dollars on this delusional pipe dream, on wind and solar alone, 2.2 trillion to be more precise and reference the most recent reports. Both industries shut down several times a day, depending on the weather, the solar industry because of the existence of something called "night." No one notices, because they're trivial and useless. Prattling on about them, as if we "needed" them - we don't - is frankly, just as you report me saying (and I say it often) delusional.

As I often repeat: It didn't work; it isn't working; and it won't work. The reason is physics.

So called "renewable energy" was in wide use for more than 2,000 years, but was abandoned in the early 19th century because most citizens of the world lived short, miserable, dire lives of poverty even more so today. When it was abandoned, the world population was less than 1 billion. It's more than 7 billion today. I am always interested to find out, who we'd like to nominate to die so we can all live again in this putative "renewable nirvana." The Chinese perhaps? The Indians? They seem particularly disinterested in our bourgeois electric cars powered by solar energy fantasies.

Some people have a fondness for the expansion of poverty. I don't. It's not my liberalism; it may be yours, but not mine.

Frankly, I consider this issue in Energy and the Environment the most important issue before humanity.

You may call it "pimping" but in the current case, but I would consider any other approach, based on what I have learned, to be morally appalling. I'm not one of the people around here whoring for gas, which is precisely what the so called "renewable energy" industry has brought us. Gas, more and more and more of it.

My life is approaching its end, and when I die, I want to do so with a feeling that I at least struggled to become decent. My fierce nuclear advocacy is a part of that. You may find that amusing, but I really don't care what anyone thinks. One must do what one believes to be right.

Stick to watching Coen brothers movies. They're cute; meaningless, but cute. I have something far more important to do.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

But Heaven forbid Monsatan lose a single penny in share value. sandensea Oct 2018 #1
Kick and recommend for visibility bronxiteforever Oct 2018 #2
Yeah, thanks Monsanto. You realize you're dooming yourselves, too, right? donkeypoofed Oct 2018 #3
It's always nice to have a bogeyman, but I suspect bogeyman hating will do absolutely nothing... NNadir Oct 2018 #4
Monsanto is not a mere bogeyman.They are a suicidal out of control, corrupted capitalist corporation Farmer-Rick Oct 2018 #7
Post removed Post removed Oct 2018 #14
You nailed it there. mountain grammy Oct 2018 #16
Exactly... NNadir Oct 2018 #18
I like your spirit, man, I hope you don't get me wrong ... mr_lebowski Oct 2018 #19
I have the full PNAS scientific paper before me. NNadir Oct 2018 #15
That's fair, but it's also fair to say that you're referencing the PNAS study mr_lebowski Oct 2018 #20
At the risk of being told I'm "pimping" for Monsanto instead of routinely "pimping" for nuclear... NNadir Oct 2018 #22
The excessive posting is a sign of a serious problem Farmer-Rick Oct 2018 #26
Biggest problem though imo is that we as a species are breeding like cstanleytech Oct 2018 #23
In general, I agree with this; however in many conversations I've had in my lifetime on the topic... NNadir Oct 2018 #24
They do not need to commit suicide they just need to be freaking responsible and reign in cstanleytech Oct 2018 #25
Rambling nonsensical pseudoscience Farmer-Rick Oct 2018 #27
This study was done deep in a protected rainforest NickB79 Oct 2018 #28
I'd be ok with a mosquito extinction event, but that's it! nt Lucky Luciano Oct 2018 #5
and bedbugs AdamGG Oct 2018 #10
and cockroaches... llmart Oct 2018 #12
I've noticed. I've always loved the bugs. BlancheSplanchnik Oct 2018 #6
Rachel Carson warned us .. DemoTex Oct 2018 #8
My all time favorite book. llmart Oct 2018 #13
We capture critters in our house and let them go outside. And we sing, "Born free.......!" hostalover Oct 2018 #9
when was the last time you had to wash insect splatter off your windshield? elmac Oct 2018 #11
That's exactly what we noticed in our travels.. mountain grammy Oct 2018 #17
I commute in East Tennessee GaYellowDawg Oct 2018 #21
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»'Hyperalarming' study sho...»Reply #18