Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Science

MBS

(9,688 posts)

5. This is bad news.

Reply to Eugene (Original post)

Sat Jul 13, 2019, 05:57 AM

Jul 2019

Gerstenmeier and Hill are deeply competent and have integrity. I know nothing about their replacements, but the fact that they’re even being replaced seems to me a bad sign.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

NASA shake-up leaves space program in confusion [View all] Eugene Jul 2019 OP

Seriously? We're going back to the moon? CrispyQ Jul 2019 #1

those funds wouldn't make a dent in climate change qazplm135 Jul 2019 #2

Not sure re-exploration of the moon SCantiGOP Jul 2019 #3

absolutely makes sense qazplm135 Jul 2019 #4

this is my simple argument for what you say... Javaman Jul 2019 #6

I agree that the disparity in those budgets is obscene. CrispyQ Jul 2019 #7

Trump doesn't count the first moon landing because it wasn't "the best landing ever." LastLiberal in PalmSprings Jul 2019 #8

This is bad news. MBS Jul 2019 #5

Houston, we have a problem FiveGoodMen Jul 2019 #9

Republicans are now quite open about being troglodytes. Open racism... NNadir Jul 2019 #10

Trump was told we need to go to the moon first to see what problems accur over a long period of time Everyman Jackal Jul 2019 #11