Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Science

NNadir

(37,781 posts)

3. Intermittent forms of energy are an environmental disaster.

Reply to Beartracks (Reply #2)

Thu Sep 5, 2019, 10:17 PM

Sep 2019

We don't need more future electronic waste, which is what solar cells will become in about 20 years time.

We need reliable energy. There is one, and only one, safe and sustainable form of energy. That is nuclear energy.

The solar and wind fantasy has not worked, is not working and will not work. The reason is physics.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Hours of the Top 50 CAISO Electricity Loads in California, July 2019. [View all] NNadir Sep 2019 OP

great! let's put a chernobyl in every back yard! nt msongs Sep 2019 #1

Or we can use sensible fact based science rather than defacto7 Sep 2019 #4

Because history shows that every nuclear plant is Igel Sep 2019 #8

Even as more renewables come online, total demand still grows. Beartracks Sep 2019 #2

Intermittent forms of energy are an environmental disaster. NNadir Sep 2019 #3

Nuclear is not the answer... NeoGreen Sep 2019 #5

Worth repeating... NeoGreen Sep 2019 #7

Which is why Igel Sep 2019 #9

There is only one answer to our future energy supply conundrum... NeoGreen Sep 2019 #6