"The journalists engaged in this reporting remind me of a really, really stupid guy who made it to my ignore list here who once represented that the collapse of a tunnel at the Hanford Reservation, which turned out to contain some slightly radioactive discarded chemical reactors, was somehow more important than the complete destruction of the planetary atmosphere by dangerous fossil fuel waste."
No where did I say that. This is what I said. "Totally safe.
Emergency Declared At Nuclear-Contaminated Site In Washington State
The Department of Energy has declared an emergency at a nuclear-contaminated site in Washington state, after soil caved in over a portion of a tunnel containing rail cars contaminated with nuclear waste."
https://www.democraticunderground.com/1127109489#post13
And here you are a liar again.
"There are actually people who think we cannot use the nuclear tool – the only tool which has worked on a significant scale – to address, slow, and perhaps even halt, the ongoing destruction of the entire planet’s atmosphere because some fool on a Trumpian intellectual level heard about a small tunnel with some rail cars in it with old chemical reactors contaminated with a small amount of residual plutonium. One hears these kinds of things, but one really doesn’t want to believe it."
on Post 9, well before your post I said,"Technology is technology, it is intrinsically not bad. Do I think we should use nuclear energy, sure, but to say solar, I mean freaking solar, is worse than nuclear seems,,,, well a little mad. "
https://www.democraticunderground.com/1127109489#post9
Quit lying.
Eko
= new reply since forum marked as read