Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Boston_Chemist

(256 posts)
13. As I said: Astrophysics itself is interesting, but it ultimately adresses intangibles.
Wed Dec 28, 2011, 04:29 PM
Dec 2011

Last edited Wed Dec 28, 2011, 06:13 PM - Edit history (1)

Understanding answers to the questions surrounding our presence in the universe is a philosophical excercise. These questions are certainly worth answering, but they should ultimately lose out to, say, concerns of urgent immediacy. I would never propose cutting funding to the National Institutes of Health for the sake of a new and fancier telescope in orbit around the planet. It is a matter of priorities of governance.

Advances in science will come by hook or by crook. You shouldn't arrogantly assume that they are only attributable to this or that field. All physicists are chemists at some level, and all chemists are physicists at some other level. And the real worker bees are the engineering types: Hats off to them.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»We should scour the moon ...»Reply #13