I haven't seen it as it was pulled off of youtube before I could. It was generally panned.
I wondered if there was some overlap between your criticisms of the renewable fuel industry and theirs. They probably dissed nuclear energy too though.
I did like that they mentioned human overpopulation. Some sort of horrible blend of dominion theology and the most mindless kind of capitalist drive for more consumers at all costs, has made it "anti-human" to point out the obvious, even as we drive most non-human species to extinction.
If people on the left don't raise this issue, neo-nazis and far right tribalists across the world will be the only ones who do....it is so obvious to me that a 100 years down the line, this will be the rightist take on "green". We can't keep calling decent environmentalists/scientists- David Attenborough, Paul Ehrlich, Michael Moore etc. ecofascists for pointing out the obvious.
This is why I did not want a kid. Personal choice of course. But all of us at least should not rapaciously gobble up all of the planet. Some of us have got to take one for the team....Having fewer children should be recognized as a form of community service.
Advocacy for smaller families is hardly forcible sterilization. Like wearing masks or other eco-friendly choices (less meat, less consumption), it is an unselfish choice you make that so clearly benefits the planet. It is just not being recognized as one...
Of course it would be counterproductive to diss people for large families (i.e. > 2-3 kids). That just sets people's backs up since we are not yet evolved enough to see it as a selfish decision. But for those open to the idea, to frame having fewer kids as a positive contribution you could choose to make for the planet and society, might have more traction.
= new reply since forum marked as read