Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

DetlefK

(16,670 posts)
7. From nobody to nobody ;-)
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 11:17 AM
Jun 2012

Of course they should get some credit (although I can't tell how much). But my issues are legitimate:

1. Why does this discovery get an article, when hardly anyone can tell yet whether it's important or not?

2. Scale and temperature are very important. Quote from you: "...a whole host of experiments to be EASILY performed..."
No experiment at such a low temperature is easy.
And just because they found this particular system, which behaves nice in some ways, doesn't mean, they will find a similar system where this knowledge can be useful. Curie-temperature, energy-bands, spin-polarization, lattice-structure... They could all be different.
My point is: There is no guarantee, any of this research will bear any relevance. (There is almost never a guarantee. ) And I think the article makes a pretty big leap from "we'll see" to "a revolution in quantum-computing".

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Breakthru in quantum comp...»Reply #7