Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

daaron

(763 posts)
8. Fair questions.
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 02:20 PM
Jun 2012

1. Like you said - funding goes to projects seen as progressing and important, and media helps. I figure in this bizarre era of anti-intellectualism, it doesn't hurt to be a booster, when one doesn't have any further stake in a project. Like me, Science Daily has no stake, so they promote science, written for the lay reader, that they think will spark people's interest and imagination, hopefully counter some of the anti-intellectualism of this bizarre era.

2. It's true what you say - this is a potential breakthrough, not a eureka moment, and the practical obstacles to quantum computing are many, even for experiment. But then, it's not always about the application of the science. Sometimes it's just about the science. I'm just saying ... this is some cool science! Maybe there's no use for it, but really, that's not the whole point, is it? Many a discovery has been made along the way to somewhere else.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Breakthru in quantum comp...»Reply #8