Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(38,563 posts)
4. Really?
Thu Sep 23, 2021, 03:07 PM
Sep 2021

I think the weak attempt at wit says quite a bit more than may be recognized (or perhaps admitted) and I stand by my interpretation.

The fact that weather and insolation was abandoned in the 19th century as primary energy sources was very much involved with human poverty, and the reactionary effort to make humanity depend on this variability is clearly an expression of indifference to said poverty.

To claim my response proved anything other than demonstrating contempt for the poor, demonstrates only the inability to understand what one is implying.

Any interest in the soaring electricity rates because of dependence on the wind in Europe and their effect on the poorest citizens, or does the OP just inspire an attempt at a contemptuous giggle?

(Antinukes tend to giggle a lot while the world burns.)

No?

Why am I not surprised?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Analysis: Expensive winte...»Reply #4