Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

frogmarch

(12,251 posts)
9. Interesting!
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 01:29 PM
Jul 2012

Thanks for your post.

Here’s a link to longer article about it. The title ("Mystery Human Ancestor Found in African Genes&quot is somewhat misleading, but I think the article itself is quite good.

http://chronicle.com/blogs/percolator/mystery-human-ancestor-found-in-african-genes/30223

Another key finding is that most of the new variants are not genes —stretches of DNA that code for proteins that run a cell’s machinery—but regulatory regions that sit next to genes, turning them on or off, or increasing their protein production rate the way a radio volume knob increases sound. “Just because a stretch of DNA doesn’t have any genes doesn’t mean it can’t be functionally important,” noted Joseph Lachance, a postdoctoral researcher at Pennsylvania who is first author on the paper. To the contrary, he said, because those regions persisted and most genes didn’t, it shows that things like on-off switches are important evolutionary adaptations.


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»I'm not saying it's 'myst...»Reply #9