Friendly forums for passionate Dems!
More than 94 million posts since 2001
Home Latest Greatest Videos Forums Hide ads Join up!
Home Latest Greatest
Videos Forums Help
Hide ads Join up!
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Archaeologists claim obje...»Reply #2
Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Science

In reply to the discussion: Archaeologists claim objects are earliest 'matches' [View all]

Odin2005

(53,521 posts)
2. Why does every long artifact that is not understood get "interpreted" as a phallic cult object?
Reply to dipsydoodle (Original post)
Thu Aug 9, 2012, 10:50 AM
Aug 2012

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Archaeologists claim objects are earliest 'matches' [View all] dipsydoodle Aug 2012 OP
Wow. Nt xchrom Aug 2012 #1
Why does every long artifact that is not understood get "interpreted" as a phallic cult object? Odin2005 Aug 2012 #2
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Archaeologists claim obje...»Reply #2
Home | Latest Discussions | Greatest Discussions | Latest Videos | All Forums

About | Copyright | Privacy | Terms of service | Contact

In Memoriam

© 2001 - 2026 Democratic Underground, LLC. Thank you for visiting.