Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TalkingDog

(9,001 posts)
8. Agreeing with AlbertCat
Wed Aug 22, 2012, 08:48 PM
Aug 2012

If he were color deficient, then he would've used color more "haphazardly". In other words where he was using a yellow orange in the painting above, he may have added a yellow green (for the sake of argument) in random places without realizing they were different colors.

I've taught color deficient student and know of one instance (related to me by a former teacher of mine) where the artist was painting abstractly and would throw in random patches of hot pinks and lime greens in an otherwise muted field of color. When asked by my teacher why he was doing that, the artist had no clue what my teacher was talking about.

So, no. It's very highly unlikely that he used color in such a controlled manner and was in any way color deficient.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Was Vincent van Gogh Colo...»Reply #8