Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eppur_se_muova

(42,481 posts)
5. Hydrogen is being used there as ejectable mass, nothing more. It's handled by mechanical pumps and pressure.
Sat May 16, 2026, 11:59 AM
Yesterday

In contrast, ionized gases/plasmas interact with both electric and magnetic fields to produce that equal-and-opposite thrust. The electrostatic ion engine seems to be favored by high mass/charge ratio -- high m, low v means a lower delta-mv for the same delta-m(v-squared), I guess. Thrust is controlled by the electric field, whereas the classic rocket equation relies only on thermal energy (from combustion, or nuclear reactor) to give gas molecules velocity. I'm assuming MPD (a variation on MHD, presumably) creates large magnetic fields through discharges in the conducting plasma, but I'm really guessing there -- I'd really like to see a basic-math treatment of both.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Another fucking waste of money. 3Hotdogs Yesterday #1
Previous ion engines have favored very heavy atoms as propellant -- mercury or xenon. More atomic mass -- eppur_se_muova Yesterday #2
The NERVA engine used hydrogen, so (you know) lithium is heavier than that, but certainly lighter than mercury OKIsItJustMe Yesterday #4
Hydrogen is being used there as ejectable mass, nothing more. It's handled by mechanical pumps and pressure. eppur_se_muova Yesterday #5
Check out the NASA paper I added to the bottom of the reply OKIsItJustMe Yesterday #6
Thanks for the paper. I knew about the older nuclear interest. eppur_se_muova Yesterday #7
NERVA was not the same as Orion OKIsItJustMe Yesterday #8
Yes, I know that, thank you. In fact you're just repeating things I've already said in my replies. nt eppur_se_muova Yesterday #10
We both realize that (I was even repeating myself) OKIsItJustMe Yesterday #12
Ah, OK ... writing for a larger audience ... eppur_se_muova Yesterday #14
I've been watching "For All Mankind" on Apple TV OKIsItJustMe Yesterday #15
Isn't lithium in somewhat short supply? erronis Yesterday #3
Meanwhile, at a grossly overspent under intellectual trump supported SpaceX 3825-87867 Yesterday #9
NASA is facing serious cuts OKIsItJustMe Yesterday #11
More from the paper cited by OKIsItJustMe .... eppur_se_muova Yesterday #13
"It must have been a real pleasure to work out the mathematics of MPD for the first time..." OKIsItJustMe Yesterday #16
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»NASA Fires Up Powerful Li...»Reply #5