Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Anthropology
Showing Original Post only (View all)The 100th Monkey Effect? [View all]
A method of Stone Age tool production is believed to have its origins in Africa but findings of a new study challenges this notion with evidence that suggests different populations around the world independently developed their tool-making skills during the Paleolithic Era.
Scientists have argued that a tool-making technology known as the Levallois technique was invented in Africa and that the method eventually spread to Eurasia following the migration of humans from Africa. An analysis of stone artifacts in Armenia, however, suggests otherwise.
In a new discovery described in the journal Science on Sept. 26, a group of researchers examined almost 3,000 stone artifacts that were excavated from Nor Geghi 1 (NG1), an archeological site in Armenia that was preserved by two lava flows. By analyzing and dating the volcanic ash between these lava flows, the researchers found that the artifacts at the site existed between 200,000 and 400,000 years ago, the era associated with the earliest Levallois tools in Africa.
The researchers also found that the people who lived in the area thousands of years ago used both Levallois and a more rugged tool-making method called bifacial technology at the same time providing the earliest evidence that these technologies existed together and suggesting that the people there may have gradually developed Levallois technique from bifacial technology.
"We wouldn't have found this mixture if the Levallois technology had simply replaced the old method," said study researcher Daniel Adler, from the University of Connecticut in Storrs. "The communities probably worked out for themselves how to make bifacial tools and then it was a short step to the Levallois method."
http://www.techtimes.com/articles/16534/20140926/stone-age-tools-did-not-originate-from-africa-toolmaking-skills-developed-independently-worldwide.htm
Nature: Stone Age groups made similar toolmaking breakthroughs
Different palaeolithic populations around the world might have developed a crucial toolmaking skill independently. This conclusion, based on the analysis of hundreds of artefacts from a recently excavated archaeological site in Armenia, weakens a long-held theory that Stone Age people in Eurasia learnt sophisticated techniques from migrating African tribes. The work is published in Science1.
Early Stone Age populations made their tools much in the same way that Michelangelo would have made his David by chipping away at a piece of stone until the required shape emerged. Such tools are known as bifacial.
In the so-called Levallois technology, named after the Levallois-Perret suburb of Paris where it was first described, the toolmaker first chisels a suitably shaped core from a stone and then slices off flakes from it. The flakes are the tools lighter to carry, and probably more efficient to make.
Chipping away at the truth
http://www.nature.com/news/stone-age-groups-made-similar-toolmaking-breakthroughs-1.16002
The 100th Monkey Effect:
The hundredth monkey effect is a studied phenomenon[1] in which a new behavior or idea is claimed to spread rapidly by unexplained means from one group to all related groups once a critical number of members of one group exhibit the new behavior or acknowledge the new idea.
The Snow Monkeys of Japan were studied by scientists for a period of over 30 years on the island of Kosima. Beginning in 1952 scientist began to drop Sweet Potatoes in the sand. The monkeys liked the Sweet Potatoes but didnt care for the unpleasant taste of the sand. That was until a 19 month old female found that she could solve the problem by washing the sand off in the salty ocean water, improving the taste of the potato.
She then taught this trick to her mother and soon after her playmates learned this, who in turn taught it to their mothers as well. This cultural innovation was gradually picked up by numerous monkeys on the island. Between 1952 and 1958 the younger Monkeys would figure out this technique and would teach it to their elders. The adults who did this with their children themselves learned this Cultural Improvement, however some older adults did not right away.
Heres where is starts to get interesting
In the autumn of 1958 something startling took place, a massive increase of snow monkeys began washing their sweet potatoes. The exact number was not known, however the hypothetical number given was 99, as to when the 100th monkey learned how to wash their sweet potatoes a critical mass of innovation accrued. This added energy of the hundredth monkey somehow created a conscious break through, to where almost everyone in the troop were washing their sweet potatoes.
Heres the REALLY interesting part
Something even crazier that the scientist were not expecting to happen accrued.THE CULTURAL INNOVATIONS JUMPED ACROSS THE SEA!!!
The monkeys across the other islands started washing their potatoes in the ocean as well, and in great number almost as if it was understood on a higher level of consciousness.
This experiment brings to light the idea of a Collective Consciousness, where as if it is only a few number of individuals know a new idea or way of life, then it remains the conscious property of those individuals, but at the critical mass of the 100th Individual the awareness becomes the conscious property of all.
http://www.mindopenerz.com/the-100th-monkey-effect-a-critical-mass/
See also
The Global Consciousness Project - Princeton University
http://www.theavalonfoundation.org/docs/gcpannounce.html
I don't know myself but I'd thought I'd throw these thoughts out to you for consideration
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies