Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Anthropology

Judi Lynn

(160,527 posts)

7. I read about what you explained not too long ago. They were very much worried at that time.

Reply to sinkingfeeling (Reply #5)

Thu May 16, 2019, 04:50 AM

May 2019

Whoever pushed all the reality-based concern aside to make this move for profit has done the whole world a disservice. That are needs special protection. It can't last forever with multitudes of people showing up continually. It wasn't built to take that kind of traffic.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

'It would destroy it': new international airport for Machu Picchu sparks outrage [View all] Judi Lynn May 2019 OP

Wait ... NOT THE ONION?!? mr_lebowski May 2019 #1

Now for a big, huge neon Trump sign. in gold, of course. That would be a sight. Midnight Writer May 2019 #2

Vibes to Manchu Picchu. When I was on Margarita Island off Venezuela applegrove May 2019 #3

I know this area quite well . . . Richard D May 2019 #4

Horrible idea. Just a Peru was hoping to limit the number of visitors sinkingfeeling May 2019 #5

I read about what you explained not too long ago. They were very much worried at that time. Judi Lynn May 2019 #7

Tragic Lulu KC May 2019 #6