Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PoindexterOglethorpe

(25,848 posts)
2. That's fascinating.
Fri Jul 24, 2020, 07:09 PM
Jul 2020

The article sort of makes it sound as if smallpox is a relatively recent disease. It's not.

There are Egyptian mummies that clearly show smallpox scars. And there was an epidemic of the disease around 1350 BCE. I realize that article is talking about the genetics, and it's quite fascinating, especially how much the virus seems to have evolved over time, even though it's still smallpox.
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Anthropology»Smallpox-Infected Viking ...»Reply #2