Atheists & Agnostics

skepticscott

(13,029 posts)

28. You stated that the definition of "bigotry"

Mon Aug 12, 2013, 05:12 AM

Aug 2013

characterizes Dawkins' remark "pretty damningly". In what way does what he said match the definition of bigotry? And please, give us an argument that would convince a rational and objective observer, not just the religionists who start screaming "bigot" like Pavlovian dogs every time Dawkins opens his mouth. The fact that someone is uncomfortable with or offended by the truth doesn't make their accusations of bigotry valid. People with cockeyed worldviews are going to find the truth offensive all the time, but that doesn't mean that the truth should be off limits.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

41 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I’m wrestling with the term ‘bigot’ in relation to Richard Dawkins’ now infamous remark about Islam [View all] MrModerate Aug 2013 OP

Hasn't he been trashing Christianity for years and getting a pass... TreasonousBastard Aug 2013 #1

Your four examples are not objectively true. rrneck Aug 2013 #2

Well, that's not what I said . . . MrModerate Aug 2013 #4

Religion is not inherently bad. rrneck Aug 2013 #6

Hmm. There we disagree. MrModerate Aug 2013 #20

Trapped some may be, rrneck Aug 2013 #21

It's hard for me to look at a belief system . . . MrModerate Aug 2013 #25

I call it fiction. rrneck Aug 2013 #33

Certainly our knowledge of the universe around us . . . MrModerate Aug 2013 #37

I wouldn't call our knowledge of the universe fiction either. rrneck Aug 2013 #38

It seemed to me that 'live according to one fantasy or another . . . MrModerate Aug 2013 #39

I was talking about religion. rrneck Aug 2013 #40

You're moving the goalposts, which makes me wonder skepticscott Aug 2013 #12

Well, I wasn't trying to make a direct comparison to Dawkins' remark . . . MrModerate Aug 2013 #22

I think that frogmarch Aug 2013 #3

That's an excellent parsing of the dilemma . . . MrModerate Aug 2013 #5

Just to be clear skepticscott Aug 2013 #7

I believe this is what the quote is: Curmudgeoness Aug 2013 #8

It needs to be taken in context - See his piece here: mr blur Aug 2013 #10

Yes, exactly skepticscott Aug 2013 #11

Yes, that's the one. n/t MrModerate Aug 2013 #16

So can you specify skepticscott Aug 2013 #18

I've just read Dawkins' response to the controversy . . . MrModerate Aug 2013 #23

You stated that the definition of "bigotry" skepticscott Aug 2013 #28

In particular, the "contempt" part . . . MrModerate Aug 2013 #29

And why would a reasonable person skepticscott Aug 2013 #30

A reasonable person would see the tone of the remark, as well as the content. MrModerate Aug 2013 #31

You can not convey tone of voice through text. LostOne4Ever Aug 2013 #32

Oh, *really*? MrModerate Aug 2013 #36

And the tone of the remark skepticscott Aug 2013 #34

He didn't. Keep in mind it is a lament. Not an accusation. AtheistCrusader Aug 2013 #41

Excellent link, with great rebuffs. Curmudgeoness Aug 2013 #14

I do not think that any religion is inherently bad. Curmudgeoness Aug 2013 #9

Some of them have some pretty grim facets, such as Thuggee. When the Brits took over dimbear Aug 2013 #13

The people who are sheperding the sheep Curmudgeoness Aug 2013 #15

I'm still trying to figure out how this was a "racist" statement as I saw reported. ScottLand Aug 2013 #17

Why 'wrestle' with it? AtheistCrusader Aug 2013 #19

While your confidence is clear, many others think otherwise . . . MrModerate Aug 2013 #24

So show them his full essay. AtheistCrusader Aug 2013 #26

I've actually got better advice for Dr. Dawkins . . . MrModerate Aug 2013 #27

It's not an argument skepticscott Aug 2013 #35