Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Atheists & Agnostics
In reply to the discussion: How do you define atheism? [View all]malthaussen
(18,549 posts)18. Logically equivilant, yes.
Both beliefs are making a positive statement ("there is no Santa Claus" is a positive statement) without any backing evidence.
Now, "I'm not convinced there is a Santa Claus," or "Your evidence that Santa Claus exists is not adequate" is not the same thing as saying "There is no Santa Claus." Many atheists, however, make the statement that there is no god-thing, as an absolute truth. My own view of the multiverse does not allow for absolute statements about things of which, ultimately, I know nothing.
-- Mal
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
60 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Atheism: "Pending further evidence, I reject your magical sky man proposition."
Bryce Butler
May 2014
#4
They're not 'making it difficult'. They are attempting to validate their special pleading by
AtheistCrusader
May 2014
#12
Eh, a belief that there is no god-thing is the same as a belief that there is...
malthaussen
May 2014
#9
It is an issue when belief in the improbable magical sky being is then
Warren Stupidity
May 2014
#17