Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Atheists & Agnostics
In reply to the discussion: How do you define atheism? [View all]malthaussen
(18,531 posts)41. Raises the question of what would constitute convincing evidence...
... although every man's conviction is his own.
As I like to say, if a white-bearded face (or bearded white face) appeared in the sky and told us all he was the truth, the light, and the creator of all, it would still be an unsupported assertion.
-- Mal
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
60 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Atheism: "Pending further evidence, I reject your magical sky man proposition."
Bryce Butler
May 2014
#4
They're not 'making it difficult'. They are attempting to validate their special pleading by
AtheistCrusader
May 2014
#12
Eh, a belief that there is no god-thing is the same as a belief that there is...
malthaussen
May 2014
#9
It is an issue when belief in the improbable magical sky being is then
Warren Stupidity
May 2014
#17