Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onager

(9,356 posts)
14. Update with some bad news...
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 10:56 PM
Jan 2012

Not surprising, though...

Last night, in the comment section of the Providence Journal article on the decision, one of the good guys left Jessica’s home address in the comments so other good guys could go make her life miserable (as well as the lives of her sick mother and younger siblings). Their was no rebuke of the administrators’ law-breaking, but there was an implicit call for harassment (or worse) from those who were willing. And over the course of this ordeal we’ve learned there were a lot of good Christians who were willing. And somehow Jessica is the bad guy.

http://freethoughtblogs.com/wwjtd/2012/01/12/jessica-ahlquist-totally-was-the-bad-guy/

The local Fundie radio station here in L.A. cashed in on Ahlquist tonight, with a really annoying bait-and-switch. I posted about it in the Ahlquist thread in the Religion forum.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I am a huge organized religion basher Angry Dragon Jan 2012 #1
It's a call to prayer in a public school. n/t Ian David Jan 2012 #2
I am allowed to pray in school, any school Angry Dragon Jan 2012 #5
The SCHOOL is posting a call to prayer in a public school. Ian David Jan 2012 #9
Wrong on all counts, sir. Riktor Jan 2012 #21
Well, you can't be right all the time. ;) nt greyl Jan 2012 #4
So they should change it to "heavenly MOTHER" and then hear the squawking. PassingFair Jan 2012 #6
What does offensiveness have to do with it? Humanist_Activist Jan 2012 #8
If you feel that strongly about Constitutional restraints Angry Dragon Jan 2012 #11
Because Congress also violates the first amendment... Humanist_Activist Jan 2012 #13
I am against that, too. nt awoke_in_2003 Jan 2012 #24
Thankyou. lindysalsagal Jan 2012 #19
It is offensive. Curmudgeoness Jan 2012 #12
It is unequically illegal. ChadwickHenryWard Jan 2012 #23
Sweet! nt greyl Jan 2012 #3
But that would solve the problem DissedByBush Jan 2012 #7
Yes, this is true. They were definitely of the "Believe as we say OR ELSE" bent. Ian David Jan 2012 #10
Update with some bad news... onager Jan 2012 #14
Typical sore-loser thuggery. n/t Ian David Jan 2012 #15
Check out the vile reactions from some christians and others: mr blur Jan 2012 #16
Oh, but those aren't RealChristians(tm) BiggJawn Jan 2012 #17
"Help us to be good sports and smile when we lose" Kolesar Jan 2012 #18
The church is whitewash for hate. lindysalsagal Jan 2012 #20
Ah, the "I'm not perfect, I'm forgiven" crowd. darkstar3 Jan 2012 #22
I live in the babble belt... awoke_in_2003 Jan 2012 #25
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Atheists & Agnostics»Jessica Ahlquist Has Won ...»Reply #14