Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NeoGreen

(4,036 posts)
12. To be sure...
Fri Sep 26, 2014, 08:12 AM
Sep 2014

...the term does have its "shock" value, and I do use it to great effect when I detect a faither’s aura of superiority, greater knowledge and privilege suffusing to the surface. However, my beef is with the origin, and how it is reflecting off a state of theism. I feel that it was coined based on their terms so that they might have a chance to intellectually grasp the concept.

I prefer to use terms for non-belief that indicate not only do I reject their claim, but that their claim doesn’t even merit a reference (e.g. Freethinker, Humanist and Realist).

I'm not a theist, I'm a Realist, or if you must, an Atheist.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Atheists & Agnostics»No Religion? Here Are 7 T...»Reply #12