Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Curmudgeoness

(18,219 posts)
5. What I gather from your post
Wed Jan 7, 2015, 04:24 PM
Jan 2015

is that you want to separate the church rite from the legal contract. Interesting tack. This takes the argument about what "marriage" is away from the churches and religious people who are so upset about same sex "marriage".

A gay couple that I know have two different attitudes about the controversy. One says that he doesn't care if they call it a marriage or a domestic partnership, as long as he has all the same rights as a married couple. The other says that he is opposed to separating the terminology because he wants to be treated as equal to any other couple, and that includes calling the commitment by the same name. I see both sides. If marriage was only a rite performed in the church, and all couples have a domestic partnership unless they are religious and want the rite, that takes care of the problem.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

If the state is in the marriage business at all, it should be open to all (assuming consent, age, kelly1mm Jan 2015 #1
You mentioned 'number of partners' Neon Gods Jan 2015 #8
number of partners Kevin from WI Jan 2015 #10
Here is what I found on the interwebz: LostOne4Ever Jan 2015 #2
you're fast! RussBLib Jan 2015 #3
Some interesting statistics there JDDavis Jan 2015 #9
I voted "yes"....BUT.... AlbertCat Jan 2015 #4
What I gather from your post Curmudgeoness Jan 2015 #5
This message was self-deleted by its author Pacifist Patriot Jan 2015 #14
Marriage is not a sacrament. It's a legal status. AlbertCat Jan 2015 #18
This message was self-deleted by its author Pacifist Patriot Jan 2015 #19
If your interest is "between atheist/agnostic Democrats and believer Democrats" why aren't... brooklynite Jan 2015 #6
Absolutely yes Rob H. Jan 2015 #7
No atheist would vote against freedom, would they? JDDavis Jan 2015 #11
It's already legal in all provinces of Canada. Rainforestgoddess Jan 2015 #12
And an even simpler question... onager Jan 2015 #13
This message was self-deleted by its author Pacifist Patriot Jan 2015 #15
I need to practice better comprehension RussBLib Jan 2015 #16
This message was self-deleted by its author Pacifist Patriot Jan 2015 #17
Congratulations JDDavis Jan 2015 #20
Awesome! trotsky Jan 2015 #21
On a site like this, such a poll might be meaningless, ChairmanAgnostic Jan 2015 #22
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Atheists & Agnostics»Simple poll: Are you in f...»Reply #5