Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Atheists & Agnostics

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)

33. not worth it.

Reply to RussBLib (Reply #25)

Wed Jan 14, 2015, 12:31 PM

Jan 2015

I know..... just another one of "those" discussions where we repeat the same things we've gone over a million times and debunk... again.... the "You can't be sure" stuff all over again. Yawn.

Perhaps if in the initial statement he had hinted at what our supposed fundamental flaw in thinking was, we would have all gone ""Awwwww..... this again???? ".

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

37 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

THAT post felt like trolling [View all] RussBLib Jan 2015 OP

No clue, and actually I wouldn't have minded discussing it. trotsky Jan 2015 #1

I wasn't particularly offended by it, but it was clearly out of place for the group. Tobin S. Jan 2015 #2

I think it's a fair question coming from a religious point of view. LiberalAndProud Jan 2015 #3

Not me Rainforestgoddess Jan 2015 #4

I obviously missed something Silent3 Jan 2015 #5

Hidden. LiberalAndProud Jan 2015 #6

Ah. Doesn't bother me. Silent3 Jan 2015 #7

I thought it was a bad hide. deucemagnet Jan 2015 #8

I suspect jurors were trying to respect our safe haven. LiberalAndProud Jan 2015 #9

obviously the "quality" of the juries varies wildly RussBLib Jan 2015 #10

That really isn't and shouldn't be a jury function. Warren Stupidity Jan 2015 #16

Agreed. But the jury does what the jury does. LiberalAndProud Jan 2015 #18

I'm sure that was their intent. deucemagnet Jan 2015 #22

I dunno. Seemed like s/he was genuinely interested. progressoid Jan 2015 #11

Looked like trolling to me, too Warpy Jan 2015 #12

Yeah, I did not reply to it Mbrow Jan 2015 #13

This message was self-deleted by its author Pacifist Patriot Jan 2015 #14

That was a meddlesome jury enforcing the SOP of this forum. Warren Stupidity Jan 2015 #15

I thought it was trolling. frogmarch Jan 2015 #17

If the OP had included some reasons Jeff Murdoch Jan 2015 #19

I agree. That's why my reply was pushing for more.... PeaceNikki Jan 2015 #20

Thanks for the laugh. Goblinmonger Jan 2015 #21

It wasn't me who found it offensive. Curmudgeoness Jan 2015 #23

Agreed re justification, bvf Jan 2015 #28

Didn't see any reason for the alert or the hide. bvf Jan 2015 #24

so no one here will cop to alerting on the post? RussBLib Jan 2015 #25

not worth it. AlbertCat Jan 2015 #33

t'wernt I. PeaceNikki Jan 2015 #36

I agree RussBLib Jan 2015 #37

Atheists! We are worse than ZOMBIE HITLERZ!1! onager Jan 2015 #26

speaking of Hitler RussBLib Jan 2015 #27

That is someone banned from DU before for being rude to "a raving atheist" muriel_volestrangler Jan 2015 #29

Excellent. trotsky Jan 2015 #30

Yeah, troll. Hissyspit Jan 2015 #31

thanks, Muriel. sounds like a militant faithiest to me. RussBLib Jan 2015 #32

I guess that conversation was headed nowhere. LiberalAndProud Jan 2015 #35

Faithiest Troll. mr blur Jan 2015 #34