Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RussBLib

(10,627 posts)
10. there was a bit more in his blog post
Thu Mar 12, 2015, 02:27 PM
Mar 2015

That wasn't actually the "close" of his letter. I had snipped a few relevant paragraphs.

For the benefit of those who may not have read the entire article, here is the Superintendant's full blog post:

"Recently, I have been contacted by two concerned residents of White Oak ISD and legal counsel from the Freedom From Religion Foundation concerning the use of scripture in the “Thought for the Day” at the high school.

The residents were offended at the use of scripture, demanding that it be stopped and calling for disciplinary action against Mr. Noll. I am fully aware of the practice at the high school and will not pursue any action against our High School Principal or any other member of our faculty/staff concerning this issue.

The letter from the FFRF is not the first received by the district. They contacted us in the fall with concerns about the practices at our football games. I have responded in accordance with their stated concerns and we have moved on.

Let me be clear, this is an attempt to draw us into a contest of words for the sole purpose of giving the FFRF a large amount of free press/recognition that they and their very few members (1,200 in Texas) do not deserve. This group and others like it, are wanting us to provide them with negative quotes to use in the promotion of their agenda. We can and will make the adjustments needed to ensure our students experience a morally sound, positive character based education. There are a multitude of options to provide our students, faculty and staff the opportunity to express their First Amendment Rights as provided for in the United States Constitution. Let me also be clear that we have not (in my opinion) violated anyone's rights and/or subjected anyone to undue stress. Bible studies and scriptures are allowed in schools. The requirement is that the material be presented in a neutral manner. It is my position that we met that standard with the morning announcements.

My recommended response to the FFRF is, “I'm sorry you feel that way. I will be praying for you and your staff daily.”

Finally, as a Christian Brother, it will not promote the values we hold so dear to assail those that disagree with the Gospel. We will state our case. We will make sure our rights are just as protected as anyone else that lives in this great country. We will continue to provide for all the needs of our students and we will do so while traveling the High Road. Don't get drawn into a game of words that has no “winner”.

Please do not waste your time and effort on these few detractors."


Yeah, don't waste your time and effort on these few detractors. Even if the detractors are right? What if the few detractors are actual federal judges? Are you going to spend time and effort on those?

And it's not an attempt to publicize FFRF, fool. It's an attempt to get your school district to follow the law.

We'll see how long he continues to travel the High Road when the shit starts hitting the fan.

I'll be sure to keep y'all posted.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This message was self-deleted by its author Pacifist Patriot Mar 2015 #1
Bump! Keep us posted. onager Mar 2015 #2
Someone in the district or the FFRF should (and probably have) mountain grammy Mar 2015 #3
that contact has been made RussBLib Mar 2015 #4
These people are going to exhaust every last avenue of indoctrination for children, at least twice AtheistCrusader Mar 2015 #5
He doesn't want to provide "negative quotes to use". Curmudgeoness Mar 2015 #6
FFRF usually wins. CrispyQ Mar 2015 #7
Superintendant Michael Gilbert is bringing a knife to a gunfight. deucemagnet Mar 2015 #8
there was a bit more in his blog post RussBLib Mar 2015 #10
Oh, it's going to have a winner all right... AtheistCrusader Mar 2015 #12
First Amendment Rights AlbertCat Mar 2015 #9
Prey, indeed. ChairmanAgnostic Mar 2015 #11
Yes, keep us updated. progressoid Mar 2015 #13
Interesting coincidence... onager Mar 2015 #14
Wish I could say I am surprised LostOne4Ever Mar 2015 #15
And nativity scenes on the courthouse lawn, they got no problem with. Manifestor_of_Light Mar 2015 #16
Victory? Could be! RussBLib Mar 2015 #17
a coda to this saga? RussBLib Mar 2015 #18
Dear Superintendent Gilbert DetlefK Mar 2015 #19
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Atheists & Agnostics»controversy brewing in Ea...»Reply #10