Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

rrneck

(17,671 posts)
2. He does a fine job of pullung her chain
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 11:54 AM
Feb 2012

but his underlying point is valid. In our species care for children has demanded tremendous resources from women. Men have taken up the slack by providing more for the family. Everything may be different since the seventies but that means nothing in evolutionary terms. Men are hardwired to defend, women to nurture.

He states repeatly that Ms. Hitchens can work if she wants, but she doesn't have to. If there are no children and there is household help that sounds like a reasonable position on his part. He'd be a real jerk if he demanded she work whether she wanted to or not.

He does a fine job of pulling the interviewers chain with the remark about "the gentler sex" and "innate skill with children" which is what is probably attracting all the attention. He saw the rhetorical bind that line of questioning created and and outflanked her.

The Guy didn't sell a zillion books for nothin'.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Atheists & Agnostics»Christopher Hitchens vers...»Reply #2