Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

EvolveOrConvolve

(6,452 posts)
7. It's a respect and civility thing
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 08:15 PM
Mar 2012

You can talk all you want about how stupid religious belief is. There's no proscription against that - believers may be offended by it, but that's too bad. I also think that religious belief is silly, and more than a little stupid. It's irrational, foolish, and idiotic, and I won't hesitate to point that out, at least here in the A&A group.

What is considered inappropriate is the demeaning of specific DU members just because they happen to be religious. There's no reason to start a flame war or attack DU believers, especially when done in a group where believers don't belong.

It would be okay to say "that person's beliefs are stupid and silly". Yes, a believer might be offended by that, but that's their problem. It would be inappropriate, though, to say, "that religious guy, DUerPosterX, is a fucking asshole", especially when referring to a fellow DUer.

Like someone said above, attack the belief, not the believer. I'd take it a step further and say, when referring to a DUer, attack their belief, not the believer. If you want to call Pat Robertson a dickhead, you won't see any complaints from me. I think that distinction should be made, because we attack religious people all the time here.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Atheists & Agnostics»Hi. I'm trying to underst...»Reply #7