Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Freelancer

(2,107 posts)
7. Why the off switch? -- an argument for continuation of awareness
Mon Nov 20, 2017, 07:53 AM
Nov 2017

Every time we make a stride in understanding life, we look back and see how it makes sense. Claws make sense. Scales make sense. A whole organism dying suddenly, at once, when only a portion of it is damaged doesn't make complete sense. Why would nature create an "off switch" for awareness? Ever notice how animals that are preyed upon, like mice or rabbits, die so easily once their situation is sealed by a predator? It's as though an ejector seat under their awareness is triggered, and out they go. Pure natural selection can't account for this. Neither animals with the "off switch" trait, nor those without it, would live to pass their trait along to offspring. Why then is the "off switch" so completely pervasive? It makes sense if the preservation of the cohesion of the animal's awareness were an evolutionary priority. If evolution went out of its way to see that a rabbit's awareness didn't just end haphazardly, but could remove itself at once in some form, then the same is true for your dog and for you.

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Atheists & Agnostics»We only ever hear about t...»Reply #7