Bias

[opiate69]

20. And.... more Bias...

At Mon Apr 16, 2012, 09:17 PM you sent an alert on the following post:

Only to a bigot nt

REASON FOR ALERT:

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. (See <a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=aboutus#communitystandards" target="_blank">Community Standards</a>.)

YOUR COMMENTS:

personal attack... one of many by this poster in this thread.

JURY RESULTS

A randomly-selected Jury of DU members completed their review of this alert at Mon Apr 16, 2012, 09:26 PM, and voted 2-4 to LEAVE IT ALONE.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: It's too non-specific. Rude, perhaps, but not directed at anyone in particular. It's a bad thread, but not worthy of action by the jury.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: This subthread seems well balanced with mean spirited douchbaggery. Such is life on DU3.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Caustic but not over the top ,considering the Snarky post it was responding to.
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT and said: It is one thing to stand up for belief, its quite another to call someone a bigot for finding risibility in an obtuse statement. This is the religion forum. I'm pretty sure that "safe haven" does not apply here because non-believers are on equal footing with believers. I could be wrong. Calling someone a bigot without any follow up adds nothing to the discussion and is disruptive.

Thank you.

Sometimes I wonder about this damned place....