Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Farmer-Rick

(10,150 posts)
11. Well the ruling in 1961 was specifically
Tue Nov 29, 2022, 04:37 PM
Nov 2022

About a test for public office. I could see the Supremes claiming that a total ban, not even allowing a known atheist to run for office, would be different. You never know with this court what they will do. They may hear a case where they rule banning nonbelievers is up to the states. Maybe a religious corporation like Hobby Lobby could want to ban atheist and bring a case.

These anti-atheist clauses in state constitutions remind me of the anti-abortion clauses in state constitutions.They mean nothing until the Supremes change the law.

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Atheists & Agnostics»Why it matters that 7 sta...»Reply #11