Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Rob H.

(5,805 posts)
24. "It is not all denominations that are lobbying for these regressive policies.
Sun May 20, 2012, 10:29 AM
May 2012
We hear from the very vocal extremist voices. They are probably not even the majority."


It doesn't matter whether they are the majority if they have the ear of the majority.

There were three bills voted on recently in Tennessee, where I live: the "Don't Say Gay" bill, the "Monkey Bill," and the "Gateway Sexual Activity"* bill. Thanks in part to the efforts of the Family Action Council of Tennessee, a right-wing religious organization, only the "Don't Say Gay" bill didn't pass Tennessee's Republican-dominated legislature. (It's just been shelved for the time being, not withdrawn, so this lunacy will likely return next session.) Republican Gov. Haslam signed the Gateway Sexual Activity bill into law, but he allowed the "Monkey Bill" to become law without signing it.

It's worth adding that, inspired by Tennessee's initial success in getting the "Don't Say Gay" bill passed by the House, Missouri proposed its own version of the bill. It appears to be dead for the time being, too.


*Kissing and holding hands? Better not tell kids it's okay to do that in Tennessee! That's gateway sexual activity! The law will allow teachers who mention contraception as a means of preventing pregnancy to be punished, so it appears that now Tennessee sex education might effectively become abstinence-only, which doesn't work.

Here's what Stephen D. Foster Jr. at addictinginfo.org had to say, in part:

The law also levies a fine of up to $500 to guest speakers who promote safe sex or “gateway sexual activity.” So if a speaker from Planned Parenthood or another organization visits the sex education class to speak, talking about anything that isn’t abstinence-only would be punished. What this amounts to is the punishing of free speech and it’s the Republicans who passed it.

Sex education teachers are being boxed in by a party that has been hijacked by religious extremists who think anything they consider sexual is evil. This bill has made Tennessee a joke. To outlaw crucial information from being discussed in sex education is unfair to students who will one day have to go out into the real world unprepared. Sex is a part of human nature and when abstinence-only is all that is taught, the likelihood that students will have unsafe sex that lead to unwanted pregnancies increase. If Republicans really believe that teaching only abstinence will stop kids from having sex, they’re living in a dream world. If there is one thing teenagers are curious about when they hit puberty, it’s sex. No matter what parents do to keep their kids from engaging in sexual activity, they can’t protect their kids all of the time. That’s why teaching about safe sex methods is critical. Because if kids are going to have sex, they should at least have the knowledge to make it safe. But since when do Republicans actually want our children to learn anything at all? It’s almost as if the GOP wants our kids to be stupid and unsafe.


Tennessee is in the top 10 states with highest rates of teen pregnancy already! (TN legislators should have just looked at Texas and the skyrocketing teen pregnancy rate after abstinence-only became the norm there.)

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Yep, nothing new to those of us who have been around awhile. trotsky May 2012 #1
This x 1,000 Goblinmonger May 2012 #3
I suspect if it were an extremist RW fundamentalist who was advocating a theocracy, you'd surely see hlthe2b May 2012 #2
Maybe I'm reading it wrong, but you seem to be using a hypothetical dmallind May 2012 #6
You are lumping any number of very disparate denominations of Protestant & even Catholic Christians hlthe2b May 2012 #7
you don't know a lot about the different religions and the wide swath of Christian denominations AlbertCat May 2012 #9
I'm talking about their public advocacy lobbying differences Get a grip hlthe2b May 2012 #10
Your hatred and intense intolerance AlbertCat May 2012 #14
In this case, the shoe not only "fits" but seems permanently attached. hlthe2b May 2012 #15
Yeah yeah.... whatever... AlbertCat May 2012 #17
Where the fuck did I say all? dmallind May 2012 #11
You are very disingenous in your representation of what I said. hlthe2b May 2012 #13
AKA "I got called on bullshit I can't defend so I'm taking my ball and going home". Enjoy your day. dmallind May 2012 #16
"It is not all denominations that are lobbying for these regressive policies. Rob H. May 2012 #24
+100 Well said. Starboard Tack May 2012 #30
IMO much of this stems from LDS political opposition to California Prop 8 HereSince1628 May 2012 #4
Thank you. daaron May 2012 #8
It's fascinating. It's a slow-motion trainwreck. Utterly captivating. nt daaron May 2012 #5
It's like the wreck of a clown car... WillParkinson May 2012 #12
It's always been like that. laconicsax May 2012 #18
I think that is interesting. nt ZombieHorde May 2012 #19
Why not attack religion? Yavapai May 2012 #20
Why is criticism an attack? Paranoid anyone? Viva_Daddy May 2012 #21
Who are you asking? cleanhippie May 2012 #22
I believe it's top down... MrMickeysMom May 2012 #23
Movie that begins with Z? Manifestor_of_Light May 2012 #27
I think you've heard of this one... MrMickeysMom May 2012 #28
Zardoz with Sean Connery??? Manifestor_of_Light May 2012 #25
Huh? cleanhippie May 2012 #26
I am an atheist, but I do not attack anyone else's religion. RebelOne May 2012 #29
I think most atheists agree with you. I certainly do. Starboard Tack May 2012 #31
Ok but they are preaching to us, worse they are demanding that their Warren Stupidity May 2012 #34
When I point out the absurdities and illogic of xtianity, Manifestor_of_Light May 2012 #32
I don't recall much of a problem attacking that fruitcake Santorum for his religious nuttery. Warren Stupidity May 2012 #33
It doesn't have to be hypocritical... Pigman May 2012 #35
Welcome to DU! laconicsax May 2012 #36
That will nip Mormonism in bud... Pigman May 2012 #38
Lots of fun about absurdity, not much talk about the real problem-overbreeding. n/t dimbear May 2012 #37
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Atheists & Agnostics»I am finding it very inte...»Reply #24