Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dmallind

(10,437 posts)
4. Somewhat torn on the responses
Fri Dec 16, 2011, 10:22 AM
Dec 2011

Certainly expected gleeful Christian pratings, so no worries there.

On the vitriolic nature of them, I have always considered it deceitful, cowardly and facile to respond to someone a day after their death any differently than you did the day before. I considered Falwell for example an evil, vicious charlatan when he was alive and said so readily when he was dead. The idea of "respect" for the recently deceased, regardless of how much respect you had for them ante mortem is as artificial a custom as insisting that anything but high tea precisely at 4pm is booorish and low class. I don't mind believers saying they loathed the man if they said the same before he died.

Where I do find them wanting is in the insistence that he must now see the truth of their invisible friend. That's not honesty but guesswork and superstition. By all means hate a guy after death you hated before his death, but it's tacky at least and quite possibly psychotic to try tospeak for him while you are doing it.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Saw a "I'll bet he believes in god and the devil NOW" post BiggJawn Dec 2011 #1
Send them this. RC Dec 2011 #12
That cartoon is demeaning to women. PassingFair Dec 2011 #13
Come on, really? truebrit71 Dec 2011 #19
No, I really find it offensive. PassingFair Dec 2011 #20
No. The last panel is pretty terrible. n/t iris27 Dec 2011 #24
After thinking about it, you are correct. The original could have been better. RC Dec 2011 #25
Thank you! PassingFair Dec 2011 #26
Nice. -nt CrispyQ Dec 2011 #28
It is. CrispyQ Dec 2011 #27
He was so young.. 62 is really young in my book kdmorris Dec 2011 #2
Half genius and half "gin-soaked popinjay"... PassingFair Dec 2011 #3
Who isn't? n/t Ian David Dec 2011 #5
LOL! PassingFair Dec 2011 #6
But the very same people who are good sometimes are the very same people who are bad sometimes. Ian David Dec 2011 #7
Classy Armin-A Dec 2011 #17
DU Jurors. trotsky Dec 2011 #11
Yeah - I can be a complete bitch at times, too kdmorris Dec 2011 #9
62 is looking younger to me every day! trotsky Dec 2011 #10
Yeah.. 20 years ago it seems "reallly really old!!" :) n/t kdmorris Dec 2011 #14
Somewhat torn on the responses dmallind Dec 2011 #4
Wasn't a big fan of his TZ Dec 2011 #8
I never understood that. ChadwickHenryWard Dec 2011 #18
Sam Harris was the same. PassingFair Dec 2011 #21
One thing though TZ Dec 2011 #29
I remember when Sagan died pokerfan Dec 2011 #15
There was a war on Twitter this morning... OswegoAtheist Dec 2011 #16
I fully expected this, but I still find it disgusting. Quartermass Dec 2011 #22
"He who is without sin can cast the first stone." lindysalsagal Dec 2011 #23
therein lies the problem... awoke_in_2003 Dec 2011 #30
but Hitchens didn't believe in Hell JI7 Dec 2011 #31
For any version of Christianity that believes in Hell, most definitely. iris27 Dec 2011 #35
Says a lot about people who believe in hell. RueVoltaire Dec 2011 #32
Or masochistic laconicsax Dec 2011 #33
And religious believers are "offended" and "insulted" when we ask them to stand up and MarkCharles Dec 2011 #34
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Atheists & Agnostics»"Unrepentant Christo...»Reply #4