Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Atheists & Agnostics
In reply to the discussion: Agnostics are not Atheists and they deserve their own forum. [View all]EvolveOrConvolve
(6,452 posts)54. If you're not sure, then you lack an active belief in a god or gods
Atheism=absence of belief in deity.
Most atheists simply lack a belief in any god, which is the exact same position you take. I can count on one hand the number of atheists I've met who actively believe that there is no god* (that's both on-line and in real life).
If you want more information, you should Google the difference between weak atheists and strong atheists. While you self-identify as an "agnostic", weak atheists identify as "atheist", even while holding the same views as you.
Just so you know, it's highly offensive to accuse atheists of being "just another religion". Part of our identity is in our lack of religious belief, and the accusation is meaningless as anything other than an insult.
(* - there's a significant difference between actively and explicitly believing there is no god and simply lacking a belief)
Most atheists simply lack a belief in any god, which is the exact same position you take. I can count on one hand the number of atheists I've met who actively believe that there is no god* (that's both on-line and in real life).
If you want more information, you should Google the difference between weak atheists and strong atheists. While you self-identify as an "agnostic", weak atheists identify as "atheist", even while holding the same views as you.
Just so you know, it's highly offensive to accuse atheists of being "just another religion". Part of our identity is in our lack of religious belief, and the accusation is meaningless as anything other than an insult.
(* - there's a significant difference between actively and explicitly believing there is no god and simply lacking a belief)
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
114 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Would you accept the opinion of the guy who invented the word to desctibe himself?
dmallind
Jul 2012
#11
No - he's stating that agnosticism is in fact nothing to do with belief. Atheism is not mentioned.
dmallind
Jul 2012
#14
He mentioned atheists in the sentence just before your quote started
muriel_volestrangler
Jul 2012
#66
Albert Cat, perfect response to pure and utter rubbish being spread here by cowards who hide under .
Brewinblue
Jul 2012
#87
I believe something exists when there is evidence of that somethings existence
michael811
Jul 2012
#6
Sure - so what's your beef with atheists again? (definitions matter - or what about blurgelpibs?) nt
dmallind
Jul 2012
#84
Being an atheist who's accused of being part of "just another religion" is offensive because
valerief
Jul 2012
#56
And now, we can address the initial question, in a better manner than the OP.
dmallind
Jul 2012
#101
"Why is there something rather than nothing?" "Just wait. There won't be for long."
valerief
Jul 2012
#79
By the seed of magical thinking that is planted in most of our heads as children...
redqueen
Aug 2012
#113