Agnostics are not Atheists and they deserve their own forum.

[muriel_volestrangler]

66. He mentioned atheists in the sentence just before your quote started

When I reached intellectual maturity, and began to ask myself whether I was an atheist, a theist, or a pantheist; a materialist or an idealist; a Christian or a freethinker, I found that the more I learned and reflected, the less ready was the answer; until at last I came to the conclusion that I had neither art nor part with any of these denominations, except the last. The one thing in which most of these good people were agreed was the one thing in which I differed from them. They were quite sure that they had attained a certain "gnosis"--had more or less successfully solved the problem of existence; while I was quite sure I had not, and had a pretty strong conviction that the problem was insoluble. And, with Hume and Kant on my side, I could not think myself presumptuous in holding fast by that opinion ...

http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/mathew/sn-huxley.html

I think RR was right in #12; Huxley was saying that an agnostic, as he defined it, is not an atheist.