Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Skepticism, Science & Pseudoscience
In reply to the discussion: Michael Pollan as GMO ‘denialist’ dupes credulous New York Times [View all]proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)34. Don't miss this.
http://www.elle.com/news/culture/gmo-food-debate
Let's Discuss (Again): The GMO Food Debate
ELLE, August 9 2013
Because the issue of the safety of genetic modified food is such a deeply contentious one, when ELLE published Caitlin Shetterlys story "Bad Seed," we expected that some might object that it unfairly maligned GMOs. And Jon Entine, the author of Scared to Death: How Chemophobia Threatens Public Health, has done that in Slate.
In our piece, Shetterly recounts how she and her allergist came to believe that genetically altered corn was the probable cause of the debilitating, allergic illness that afflicted her, one marked by a profusion of a kind of white blood cells called eosinophils. Her point of view was clear, but at the same time sheand ELLEwere committed to airing both sides of the GMO debate.
Entine, however, ignored passages in the piece that didnt fit his thesis that so-called lifestyle magazines like ELLE credulously stoke conspiratorial fears about GMOs. For example, Shetterly included the perspective of Amal Assaad, MD, a professor at the University of Cincinnati medical school, who dismisses Shetterlys anxiety over GMOs safety as almost magical thinking. The story continues: Whats wrong with chemicals? [Assaad] asked. Were so afraid of chemicals because they are man-made, right? A lot of chemicals have helped usa lot of medications are chemicals. If anything, GMO foods have been a boon to mankind, Assaad said. GMO seeds produce better crops that have increased production, that are resistant to pesticidescrops that can feed the rest of the world.
Entine also communicated with Shetterlys sources, some of whom took issue with how their opinions were portrayed. After reviewing the work of Shetterly and ELLEs fact-checker, who examined the transcripts of interviews with each source and/or confirmed their statements via email or by phonewe stand by our story.
<>
In the course of reporting the piece, Shetterly spoke with a number of researchers and medical professionals who told her they couldnt go on the record about their doubts about GMOs because they feared being sued by a biotech or agriculture company, or losing grant money provided by the private sector. Von Tiehl, who also told Entine that ELLEs article wrongly suggested that he thinks there is something scary or obviously wrong or concerning about GMO foods, was one of those who worried about his legal exposure.
<>
Here is an excerpt from the taped, transcribed interview between Shetterly and von Tiehl:
More.
Let's Discuss (Again): The GMO Food Debate
ELLE, August 9 2013
Because the issue of the safety of genetic modified food is such a deeply contentious one, when ELLE published Caitlin Shetterlys story "Bad Seed," we expected that some might object that it unfairly maligned GMOs. And Jon Entine, the author of Scared to Death: How Chemophobia Threatens Public Health, has done that in Slate.
In our piece, Shetterly recounts how she and her allergist came to believe that genetically altered corn was the probable cause of the debilitating, allergic illness that afflicted her, one marked by a profusion of a kind of white blood cells called eosinophils. Her point of view was clear, but at the same time sheand ELLEwere committed to airing both sides of the GMO debate.
Entine, however, ignored passages in the piece that didnt fit his thesis that so-called lifestyle magazines like ELLE credulously stoke conspiratorial fears about GMOs. For example, Shetterly included the perspective of Amal Assaad, MD, a professor at the University of Cincinnati medical school, who dismisses Shetterlys anxiety over GMOs safety as almost magical thinking. The story continues: Whats wrong with chemicals? [Assaad] asked. Were so afraid of chemicals because they are man-made, right? A lot of chemicals have helped usa lot of medications are chemicals. If anything, GMO foods have been a boon to mankind, Assaad said. GMO seeds produce better crops that have increased production, that are resistant to pesticidescrops that can feed the rest of the world.
Entine also communicated with Shetterlys sources, some of whom took issue with how their opinions were portrayed. After reviewing the work of Shetterly and ELLEs fact-checker, who examined the transcripts of interviews with each source and/or confirmed their statements via email or by phonewe stand by our story.
<>
In the course of reporting the piece, Shetterly spoke with a number of researchers and medical professionals who told her they couldnt go on the record about their doubts about GMOs because they feared being sued by a biotech or agriculture company, or losing grant money provided by the private sector. Von Tiehl, who also told Entine that ELLEs article wrongly suggested that he thinks there is something scary or obviously wrong or concerning about GMO foods, was one of those who worried about his legal exposure.
<>
Here is an excerpt from the taped, transcribed interview between Shetterly and von Tiehl:
CS: Do you read labels and see all those hidden places where GMO corn is like xanthan gum, citric acid, ascorbic acid, natural flavorings? [GMO corn is used to make all those substances.] Would you not buy those things?
KVT: I cant answer that question for legal reasons.
CS: Really?...
KVT: I cant tell you how I have personally changed my diet.
CS: Because youre afraid of being sued?
KVT: Because Im afraid of being sued by big agribusiness.
More.
MORE:
http://www.elle.com/beauty/health-fitness/healthy-eating-avoid-gmo-corn
http://gmwatch.org/index.php/news/archive/2013/14956-elle-hits-back-at-entine-over-bad-seed
http://gmwatch.org/index.php/news/archive/2013/14800
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
53 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Ok, let's look to the scientists for safety of 'food additives,' where most are exposed to GMOs.
proverbialwisdom
Oct 2013
#1
YOU: Reject Pollan on GMOs, not a scientist. ME: Fine. Read this knowing that GMOs = food additives.
proverbialwisdom
Oct 2013
#6
Food additives derived from GMO corn, GMO soy, GMO canola, GMO cottonseed are indeed 'GMOs.'
proverbialwisdom
Oct 2013
#11
I said you were in la la land, and then you further prove it with your response.
HuckleB
Oct 2013
#13
The science-based links are at odds with the business-based links. Got cognitive dissonance?
proverbialwisdom
Oct 2013
#19
SEE POST #1, please note depth and breadth of analysis of currently abysmal state of affairs.
proverbialwisdom
Oct 2013
#21
Hardly. Here are all the links separated from the news aggregating sites you're so fond of dissing.
proverbialwisdom
Oct 2013
#23
That translates into a whole lotta recent science w zero relevance of personal attacks on M.Pollan.
proverbialwisdom
Oct 2013
#24
The update was to my own post which lit up the yellow tab for MY POSTS and linked to this old post.
proverbialwisdom
Jan 2014
#48
PRESS RELEASE > Environmental Chemicals Harm Reproductive Health: Ob-Gyns Advocate for Policy Change
proverbialwisdom
Oct 2013
#2
Nope, The American Society for Reproductive Medicine & The American College of Obstetricians and Gyn
proverbialwisdom
Oct 2013
#7
GMO's are mainly consumed as food additives which scientists, not Pollan, are assessing in my links.
proverbialwisdom
Oct 2013
#12
No need to be rude. The whole world (slightly exaggerated) apart from the US is wrong? Snort. nt
proverbialwisdom
Oct 2013
#16
Oh, please, it's a PRESS RELEASE backed by 57,000 ob-gyns + 7.000 reproductive medicine specialists.
proverbialwisdom
Oct 2013
#8
RECOMMENDED Press Statement, along with Pollan's brilliant 'Food Rules: An Eater's Manual.'
proverbialwisdom
Oct 2013
#26
Check it out. DISCLAIMER: Recognized experts, although I have no familiarity with Robbins or event.
proverbialwisdom
Oct 2013
#31
Please see http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2000-09-03/xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-NEW-PROTEINS
proverbialwisdom
Oct 2013
#33
Ah, I see you've posted from the highly respected science magazine Elle
EvolveOrConvolve
Oct 2013
#35
Go figure. Your source cynically parses words or is woefully uninformed.
proverbialwisdom
Oct 2013
#38
"This is not a hit piece on Michael Pollan" - I'd hate to read what the author does consider
muriel_volestrangler
Oct 2013
#40
If that's your understanding, may I suggest due diligence necessitates additional reading?
proverbialwisdom
Jan 2014
#49