Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Skepticism, Science & Pseudoscience

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)

3. What edit were you trying to make?

Reply to Orrex (Reply #2)

Wed Mar 26, 2014, 03:06 PM

Mar 2014

That article labels the subject as pseudoscientific. It states that "no scientific studies give credibility to the existence of indigo children or their traits...."

For the reasons explained in the OP, if you were trying to remove or obfuscate that information, then, yes, your edits would be reverted.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

17 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Wikipedia founder responds to woo petition [View all] LostOne4Ever Mar 2014 OP

Silly skeptics with their "facts" and "evidence" progressoid Mar 2014 #1

And yet when I edit the Indigo Children page, my edits get deleted Orrex Mar 2014 #2

What edit were you trying to make? Jim Lane Mar 2014 #3

If you must nkow, I attempted to add these scientific facts to the entry: Orrex Mar 2014 #4

Your edits are not to style.. Springslips Mar 2014 #5

Then I guess you'd reject the additional fact Orrex Mar 2014 #6

I reject your assertion that they are impervious to meteor strikes flying rabbit Mar 2014 #8

*SNORT* trotsky Mar 2014 #7

I am more inclined to 'trust' TM99 Apr 2014 #9

Then you should support this LostOne4Ever Apr 2014 #10

Sometimes I wonder if sources are actually ever read during internet discussions. TM99 Apr 2014 #11

some questions and thoughts LostOne4Ever Apr 2014 #12

Some replies and further thoughts. TM99 Apr 2014 #13

Thanks you for the detailed response LostOne4Ever Apr 2014 #14

You are most welcome. TM99 Apr 2014 #15

just in passing, I'd take Sheldrake's concern as worthy of note Men Without Waves Jun 2014 #16

Are they peer reviewed? quakerboy Jun 2014 #17