Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Skepticism, Science & Pseudoscience

(63,203 posts)

6. Then I guess you'd reject the additional fact

Wed Mar 26, 2014, 06:12 PM

Mar 2014

that Indigos can close either nostril at will and are impervious to meteor strikes.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

17 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Wikipedia founder responds to woo petition [View all] LostOne4Ever Mar 2014 OP

Silly skeptics with their "facts" and "evidence" progressoid Mar 2014 #1

And yet when I edit the Indigo Children page, my edits get deleted Orrex Mar 2014 #2

What edit were you trying to make? Jim Lane Mar 2014 #3

Your edits are not to style.. Springslips Mar 2014 #5

Then I guess you'd reject the additional fact Orrex Mar 2014 #6

I reject your assertion that they are impervious to meteor strikes flying rabbit Mar 2014 #8

*SNORT* trotsky Mar 2014 #7

I am more inclined to 'trust' TM99 Apr 2014 #9

Then you should support this LostOne4Ever Apr 2014 #10

some questions and thoughts LostOne4Ever Apr 2014 #12

Some replies and further thoughts. TM99 Apr 2014 #13

Thanks you for the detailed response LostOne4Ever Apr 2014 #14

You are most welcome. TM99 Apr 2014 #15

just in passing, I'd take Sheldrake's concern as worthy of note Men Without Waves Jun 2014 #16

Are they peer reviewed? quakerboy Jun 2014 #17