HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Topics » Science » Skepticism, Science & Pseudoscience (Group) » "We'll have to agree to d... » Reply #3
In the discussion thread: "We'll have to agree to disagree" [View all]

Response to progressoid (Original post)

Sun Mar 13, 2016, 08:14 PM

3. No. Never. It's bait. INSTEAD: "Let's agree THAT we disagree."

Agreeing to disagree elevates disagreement as closure, an end. It's not.

Agreeing that we disagree is to say that we both acknowledge hearing each others ideas.

And, it provokes the idea that we need to identify that disagreement.

That's why Republicans use the wrong form. It is designed to let them run and hide from the truth rather than dealing with truth. They want to run back to their authority figures on radio and Fox listening to lengthy half-truths and rolling lists of unfinished unchallenged attacks. Attacks that make them feel powerful until they realize that they cannot answer challenges except by changing the topic quickly over and over again. Or, by invoking a false ending.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 9 replies Author Time Post
progressoid Mar 2016 OP
Tobin S. Mar 2016 #1
progressoid Mar 2016 #4
trotsky Mar 2016 #7
Archae Mar 2016 #2
progressoid Mar 2016 #5
LineNew Reply No. Never. It's bait. INSTEAD: "Let's agree THAT we disagree."
Festivito Mar 2016 #3
progressoid Mar 2016 #6
yellowcanine May 2016 #8
progressoid May 2016 #9
Please login to view edit histories.